🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System and Ideology

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.